George Weigel

Not Forgotten

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

The Case for Dynamic Orthodoxy

In two years, the Catholic Church will mark the second anniversary of the solemn opening of the Second Vatican Council. Yet the debate over the meaning of Vatican II continues throughout the world Church. Some now openly charge that the very idea of a “pastoral” council was a grave mistake and propose that Vatican II should be quietly forgotten. Others continue to insist that the Church underwent a “paradigm shift” at Vatican II, as if something similar to the Copernican revolution that displaced Earth from the centre of the cosmos happened to Catholicism’s self-understanding between October 11, 1962 (when the Council opened) and December 8, 1965 (when the Council closed).

Neither of these proposals does justice to Pope St John XXIII’s intention for the Council. Neither does justice to the Council’s texts read properly. And neither seems aware that the living parts of the world Church today are those that embrace Vatican II in full, having read it in continuity with the Church’s settled tradition.

Click here to access a PDF of the full text of this article.

George Weigel is the Distinguished Senior Fellow and William E. Simon Chair in Catholic Studies at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

This article was originally published on The Portal (UK)


Share This Post

Latest Articles

Catholic And Vatican Affairs

The White-Martyr Cardinals’ Dinner

The conversation turned to those times when the Lord seems to be deaf to the pleas of his people—times not unlike what many Catholics experience today.

Catholic And Vatican Affairs

Cardinal George Pell: The Encourager

I know of few, if any, public figures who have displayed the moral courage George Pell displayed for decades.


Stay in the know by receiving George Weigel’s weekly newsletter